Debate About The Combined Oral Contraceptives (COC) Essay

Debate About The Combined Oral Contraceptives (COC) Essay Debate About The Combined Oral Contraceptives (COC) â€" Essay Example > Combined Oral Contraceptives (COC)Background And DefinitionsCombined oral contraceptives can be defined as daily pills, which are taken by women to prevent pregnancy. They usually contain tow hormonal agents hence the reasons why they are considered combined (Edwards Cohen, 2000). The hormones include estrogen and progestin that are produced in the body of a woman (Creinin, 2013). The hormones are in low dosage. The functionality of the pill is to ensure that the male sperms released into the vaginal tract do not fertilize released egg (Combined oral contraceptives, 2015). The effectiveness of these medications is based on several conditions. Firstly, the user should ensure that they do not miss taking the pill within a period of three days after finishing the previous one (Barth, 2010). Secondly, the user is required not to miss talking the pill for three days or more at the end of the pill pack otherwise she might get pregnant. This is also applicable to when a woman misses to take medication for more than three days in a row (Burkman Gabbe, 2007). The use of this contraceptive must be careful prescribed for users who have medical conditions as it might have dire side effects on them. Some of these conditions include migraines with aura, heavy smokers, and cardiovascular related medical issues. It is important to consider that the use of combined oral contraceptives and the effects they have on the users (Creinin, 2013). There are positive and negative consequences that result from this usage. This paper sought to provide analytical and debatable negative results of COC hence creating a comparative evaluation of the resultant issues. Direction for Viewpoint on Combined Oral ContraceptivesFor over four decades, COCs have been used as a means of family planning as well as fertility regulation. Over a million women globally use this form of contraception to avoid pregnancy (Burkman Gabbe, 2007). Due to this extensive use, there has been thorough medical research conducted on the usage of this medication. Several factors have facilitated this research including the variability of the composition of the drugs as well as the women taking them. This is because it presents a difficulty whereby the changes that occur cannot be quantified as the drugs have changed over the years (Barth, 2010). The second factor is the lack of representation of causal relationships when conducting epidemiological studies. Hence, the only valid relationship that has been developed is that which associates diseases development to use of COC (Combined oral contraceptives, 2015). According to the scientists and researchers, this relationship is somewhat biased with minimal validity. However, further studies have validated that COC use is indeed contributive to the development of particular diseases. Most of the researchers have argued pertaining to the effects of COC on its users who are mostly women. The main issues have been whether the positive benefits o utweigh the negatives in terms of the wellbeing of the user (Burkman Gabbe, 2007). Studies have indicated that the primary reason why there is continued use of these drugs is solely that they are able to empower women with controlling their fertility hence having the option of getting pregnancy and planning their families depending on their wants and needs (Creinin, 2013). There have also been other positive aspects of these drugs such as protection from ovarian and endometrial cancer. However, it is also valid to consider the negative aspects and their impact on the users’ lives in order to determine the viability of this method of contraception as being the best and least detrimental to heath (Combined oral contraceptives, 2015). This paper seeks to argue concerning these negative heath issues that arise from the use of COC.